Morganite, Inc. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 357
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 23, 1956
DocketNo. 59736; protests 166268-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 357 (Morganite, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morganite, Inc. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 357 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

[358]*358Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of carbon powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of Morganite, Inc. v. United States (42 C. C. P. A. 207, C. A. D. 595), the claim at 12)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 216, as modified, supra, for “plates, rods, and other forms, of whatever material composed, and wholly or partly manufactured, for manufacturing into” brushes for electric motors, generators, or other electrical machines or appliances was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of Morganite strips for trolley inserts, similar to those the subject of Morganite, Inc. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 76, C. D. 1448), were held dutiable at 12)4 percent undei said modified paragraph 216 as forms for manufacturing into brushes for electrical appliances, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morganite, Inc. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 76 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cust. Ct. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morganite-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1956.