Morgan v. Weiser Security Serv.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedAugust 31, 2007
DocketI.C. NO. 490055.
StatusPublished

This text of Morgan v. Weiser Security Serv. (Morgan v. Weiser Security Serv.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Weiser Security Serv., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Holmes with minor modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All Parties are properly before the Industrial Commission and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction of the Parties and of the subject matter.

2. All Parties have been correctly designated and there is no question as to the misjoinder or nonjoinder of Parties. *Page 2

3. A mediated settlement conference was held on April 25, 2006 before Elizabeth McCrodden wherein a settlement was reached and a mediated settlement agreement was signed by all Parties.

4. The Parties stipulated the following documents into evidence:

A. Form 18

B. Form 61

C. Form 33 filed by Plaintiff on 02/02/06

D. I.C. Acknowledgement of Form 33 and Order for Mediated Settlement Conference.

E. Form 33R filed by Defendants on 02/10/06.

F. Designation of Elizabeth McCrodden as Mediator.

G. Appointment of Mediator entered on 02/28/06.

H. Mediated Settlement Agreement dated 04/25/06.

I. Letter dated 04/26/06 from Elizabeth McCrodden with Report of Mediator.

J. Letter dated 04/26/06 from Kirk Kuhns to Gentry Hogan with Compromise Settlement Agreement, Exhibit A — medical records, Exhibit B — medical expenses.

K. Letter dated 05/8/06 from Gentry Hogan to Kirk Kuhns with advance check.

L. Letter dated 05/8/06 from Gentry Hogan to Executive Secretary Weaver with Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff and proposed Order.

*Page 3

M. Order of Executive Secretary Weaver dated 06/13/06 allowing Mr. Hogan to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff.

N. Form 33 filed by Defendants on 05/11/06.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of her injury, plaintiff worked as a security guard for Weiser Security Services, Inc., and was assigned to the Department of Transportation building.

2. On December 28, 2004, plaintiff arrived for work at the Department of Transportation. Before she clocked in or had performed any work, plaintiff fell while on her way into the building. It had recently snowed and there was ice on the ground.

3. Plaintiff sought treatment that same day at Raleigh Urgent Care Center and reported that she was "stepping out of car, slipped and fell onto back."

4. The Form 18 filed by plaintiff on January 31, 2005, states the injury occurred as follows: "While I was walking through the parking lot of my job site, I slipped and fell on ice, injuring my back and right arm."

5. On March 2, 2005, plaintiff reported to Triangle Spine Back Care Center that "she slipped and fell on some ice when she arrived at work while getting out of her car." Plaintiff testified at the hearing that she fell on the sidewalk next to the building and not in the parking lot. The Full Commission finds plaintiff's statements on the Form 18 and to her doctors more credible and rejects her testimony to the contrary. *Page 4

6. Plaintiff's claim was denied and defendants filed a Form 61 on January 10, 2005. The reason given for the denial was that "the parking lot that you fell in was not owned or maintained by your employer."

7. On February 2, 2006, Gentry Hogan, plaintiff's attorney at this time, filed a Form 33 Request that Claim be Assigned for Hearing; the grounds given were, "Defendants failed to respond to requests to discuss claim."

8. Defendants filed a Form 33R Response to Request that Claim be Assigned for Hearing disputing that plaintiff had sustained a compensable injury by accident arising out of and in the course and scope of her employment and also disputing medical causation.

9. On February 6, 2006, the parties were ordered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission to participate in mediation, and Elizabeth McCrodden was designated by the parties to serve as mediator.

10. On April 25, 2006, the parties participated in a Mediated Settlement Conference with Ms. McCrodden acting as Mediator. Defendants were represented by Kirk Kuhns and plaintiff was represented by Gentry Hogan.

11. Mr. Hogan testified that prior to the mediation, he met with plaintiff and discussed her case. Mr. Kuhns testified that during the opening session, both he and Mr. Hogan made presentations outlining their positions.

12. At the time of the mediation, plaintiff was not working and was claiming entitlement to benefits for disability related to her injuries. In addition, plaintiff was still undergoing medical treatment at that time. *Page 5

13. The greater weight of the evidence shows that all parties were aware at the mediation that Medicaid had paid for medical treatment and was asserting a lien; in addition, the parties were aware that some medical bills remained unpaid.

14. Mr. Kuhns testified that during the opening session, Mr. Hogan provided him with a document entitled "Exhibit B" which consisted of a chart that listed all of plaintiff's medical bills, payments made and by whom, and remaining balances. The document specifically states that Medicaid had made some payments, that some bills were still owed, and that defendants were not paying for any medical bills as part of the settlement.

15. The mediated settlement conference lasted approximately 2 hours. At the end of the settlement conference, the parties reached an agreement and Ms. McCrodden prepared a "Mediated Settlement Agreement" (hereinafter "Agreement") which was a pre-printed form containing various terms. McCrodden marked the terms that were part of the Agreement and handwrote additional terms. Exhibit B was attached to and made part of the Agreement. All parties signed the Agreement.

16. Mr. Hogan testified that he went over the agreement with plaintiff before she signed it. Plaintiff had an opportunity to ask questions and appeared to understand it. Mr. Hogan stated that he would not have had plaintiff sign the Agreement if she was opposed to it. The Agreement obligated the parties to execute a standard Compromise Settlement Agreement (hereinafter "Clincher") that complies with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-17 to be prepared by defendants and submitted to the Commission. In exchange, defendants were to pay the entire mediator's fee and to pay plaintiff the total sum of $5,000.00. *Page 6

17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lemly v. Colvard Oil Co.
577 S.E.2d 712 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Morgan v. Weiser Security Serv., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-weiser-security-serv-ncworkcompcom-2007.