Morgan v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedAugust 19, 2024
Docket1:22-cv-00891
StatusUnknown

This text of Morgan v. United States (Morgan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. United States, (D.N.M. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

DAVID BRIAN MORGAN,

Petitioner,

vs. No. CIV 22-0891 JB/SCY

UNITED STATES,

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Prohibition, filed September 11, 2023 (Doc. 19)(“Petition”). In the Petition, Petitioner David Brian Morgan challenges the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s Order Denying Certificate of Appealability, filed August 31, 2023 (Doc. 18). See Petition at 2-6. Because the Petition is not properly before this Court, the Court denies the Petition. “A writ of prohibition is a ‘means of confining an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction . . . .’” O’Connor v. United States, 72 F. App’x 768, 771 (10th Cir. 2003)(quoting In re Missouri, 664 F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981)). Accordingly, “a writ[] of prohibition . . . ‘may only go in aid of appellate jurisdiction.’” O’Connor v. United States, 72 F. App’x at 771 (quoting Parr v. United States, 351 U.S. 513, 519 (1956)). The Court does not have appellate jurisdiction over the Tenth Circuit nor can the Court correct the Tenth Circuit’s exercise of jurisdiction. See O’Connor v. United States, 72 F. App’x at 771 (“[T]he function of a writ of prohibition is to correct a lower court’s exercise of jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, the Court denies the Petition. IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, filed September 11, 2023 (Doc. 19), is dismissed. /\ f \ i as Me \ OQ KAS a TED STATES DISTRICT JU / Parties: \ / a a David Brian Morgan Lexington, Oklahoma Petitioner pro se

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parr v. United States
351 U.S. 513 (Supreme Court, 1956)
O'Connor v. United States
72 F. App'x 768 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)
In re Missouri
664 F.2d 178 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Morgan v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-united-states-nmd-2024.