Morgan v. . Turnage Co., Inc.

196 S.E. 307, 213 N.C. 425, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 105
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 13, 1938·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe defendant appealed from an order of tbe court below making additional parties defendant. Tbe power of tbe judge to make additional parties to an action is well settled, and it does not appear that tbe order appealed from will change tbe cause of action or work injustice to tbe appellant. Tillery v. Candler, 118 N. C., 888, 24 S. E., 709; Mills v. Callahan, 126 N. C., 756, 36 S. E., 164; Bernard v. Shemwell, 139 N. C., 446, 52 S. E., 64; Joyner v. Fiber Co., 178 N. C., *426 634, 101 S. E., 373; Barbee v. Cannady, 191 N. C., 529, 132 S. E., 281; Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N. C., 197, 185 S. E., 767.

As was said in Bernard v. Shemwell, supra, “It can very rarely happen that making an additional party will be a serious prejudice, and hence such orders are usually discretionary and not reviewable.”

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. . Turnage Co., Inc., 196 S.E. 307, 213 N.C. 425, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 105 (N.C. 1938).

196 S.E. 307 (Morgan v. . Turnage Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burgess v. Trevathan
72 S.E.2d 231 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
City of Raleigh v. Edwards
67 S.E.2d 669 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Service Fire Insurance v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.
35 S.E.2d 879 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
Bright v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
199 S.E. 630 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Bright v. Hood
214 N.C. 410 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)