Morgan v. Trimble

1 Smith & H. 366
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1849
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Smith & H. 366 (Morgan v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Trimble, 1 Smith & H. 366 (Ind. 1849).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— “ From the imperfect statement of the testimony, contained in notes taken by the judge during the trial, which is the only statement of the evidence we have, it does not clearly appear how the sum over and above the amount of the two notes was made up, as there was evidence of other indebtedness under the common counts; nor does it appear that the set-oil’claimed was not allowed. There was also some evidence, that before the barn was finished, the defendant forbid the plaintiff coming on his place, and that might have been a reason for Ms not finishing the contract, and not taking his pay in boarding.”

Judgment affirmed, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-trimble-ind-1849.