Morgan v. Talusan

61 A.D.3d 497, 875 N.Y.S.2d 893

This text of 61 A.D.3d 497 (Morgan v. Talusan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Talusan, 61 A.D.3d 497, 875 N.Y.S.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered on or about August 4, 2008, which denied petitioner’s motion to resettle and affirm an order, same court (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about September 23, 2003, denying respondent’s motion for a hearing to determine its fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court correctly understood the prior order as merely referring the matter to Supreme Court, Nassau County, and not as denying the fee application on the merits.

Under the circumstances, we find sanctions unwarranted. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A.D.3d 497, 875 N.Y.S.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-talusan-nyappdiv-2009.