Morgan v. State
This text of 207 S.W.2d 412 (Morgan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction is for unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor in a dry area.
The information charges only that Sabine County, where the offense was alleged to have been committed, was a dry area. This is not sufficient. There must be allegations showing the dry status — that is, an election and the order canvassing the returns and declaring the result and the publication of the result. See Eight v. State, 131 Tex. Cr. R. 590, 101 S. W. (2d) 258; Ballew v. State, 132 Tex. Cr. R. 534, 106 S. W. (2d) 284; Trapp v. State, 145 Tex. Cr. R. 235, 167 S. W. (2d) 525.
Because the information fails to charge an offense, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 S.W.2d 412, 151 Tex. Crim. 322, 1948 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-state-texcrimapp-1948.