Morgan v. State of Florida
This text of Morgan v. State of Florida (Morgan v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
TYRONE MARCEL MORGAN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-0398
February 20, 2026
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip James Federico, Judge.
Tyrone Marcel Morgan, pro se.
PER CURIAM. We affirm the orders denying the motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and the motion for rehearing without prejudice to Tyrone Marcel Morgan's right to challenge his habitual felony offender designation in a facially sufficient motion filed under rule 3.800(a). See Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603–04 (Fla. 2007) (holding a claim alleging a discrepancy between an oral and written sentence that can be resolved by the record is cognizable at any time under rule 3.800(a)).
LUCAS, C.J., and VILLANTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morgan v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.