Morgan v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2026·No. 2D2025-0398·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TYRONE MARCEL MORGAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2025-0398

February 20, 2026

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip James Federico, Judge.

Tyrone Marcel Morgan, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the orders denying the motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and the motion for rehearing without prejudice to Tyrone Marcel Morgan's right to challenge his habitual felony offender designation in a facially sufficient motion filed under rule 3.800(a). See Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603–04 (Fla. 2007) (holding a claim alleging a discrepancy between an oral and written sentence that can be resolved by the record is cognizable at any time under rule 3.800(a)).

LUCAS, C.J., and VILLANTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Morgan v. State of Florida (Morgan v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
957 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)