Morgan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morgan v. State

891 S.W.2d 899, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 206

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morgan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 545 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1995·No. Nos. 64304, 64313·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Morgan v. State, 891 S.W.2d 899, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

891 S.W.2d 899 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.