Morgan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morgan v. State

806 S.W.2d 463, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 1991 WL 15413

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morgan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 545 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 1991·No. No. 57934·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the allegations in her motion, the transcript of her plea of guilty, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. Those findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. [464]*464No precedential value would be served by an opinion.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the allegations in her motion, the transcript of her plea of guilty, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. Those findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. [464]*464No precedential value would be served by an opinion.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Morgan v. State, 806 S.W.2d 463, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 217, 1991 WL 15413 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

806 S.W.2d 463 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.