Morgan v. State

63 Miss. 162
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 Miss. 162 (Morgan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. State, 63 Miss. 162 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Arnold, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It is assigned for error that the court below erred in refusing to quash the indictment, and in giving an instruction for the State after the argument for appellant to the jury had closed, and that this instruction was used by the district attorney in his closing argument to the prejudice of appellant. If there was any demurrer or motion to quash the indictment, or if any instruction was given and used as alleged, it is not shown by the record.

The instruction given for the State is not subject to the objections made to it by appellant. It is true that to constitute perjury the swearing must be willful and corrupt, as well as false, but if a person swears to what he knows to be false, it is necessarily willful, and if willful, it is necessarily corrupt. 2 Whart. Cr. L., § 2204; Brown v. The State, 57 Miss. 424.

Affirmed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. State
115 So. 552 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
Wheeler v. People
63 Colo. 209 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Miss. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-state-miss-1885.