Morgan v. State
This text of 150 S.E. 452 (Morgan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged (manufacturing whisky) was wholly circumstantial and was not sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of his guilt. It follows that the verdict of guilty was contrary to law and the evidence, and the refusal to grant him a new trial was error.
2. The above-stated ruling being controlling in the case, it is unnecessary to consider the special assignments of error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 S.E. 452, 40 Ga. App. 524, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-state-gactapp-1929.