Morgan v. State
72 S.E. 347, 137 Ga. 21, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 272
Opinion
1. The court did not abuse his discretion in refusing to continue the ease.
2. The evidence authorized a charge on self-defense in ease of mutual combat, predicated on the Penal Code (1910), § 73.
3. The court did not confuse the defense of one’s person, as defined in the ' Penal Code (1910), §§ 70, .71, with the law of self-defense in case of mutual combat, as contained in the Penal Code (1910), § 73.
4. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. State, 72 S.E. 347, 137 Ga. 21, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 272 (Ga. 1911).
72 S.E. 347 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooper v. State
29 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)