Morgan v. State

137 So. 3d 1075, 2014 WL 1052351, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3975
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 2014·No. No. 3D12-1848·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

SHEPHERD, C.J.

This is an appeal by Javarus Morgan from the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Morgan asserts that section 775.087(2)(d), commonly known as Florida’s “10-20-Life” Statute, does not authorize consecutive minimum mandatory sentences for multiple qualifying crimes committed during the same criminal episode when the defendant possesses but does not discharge a firearm. We hold, as did the First District Court of Appeal in Walton v. State, 106 So.3d 522, 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (en banc), belated discretionary rev’ granted, 123 So.3d 1148 (Fla.2013), that section 775.087(2)(d) unambiguously requires that “any mandatory minimum term required by section 775.087(2) — whether the defendant fires a gun, or only carries or displays it — shall be imposed consecutively to any other term imposed for any other felony.” We further certify conflict with Irizarry v. State, 946 So.2d 555 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Affirmed. Conflict certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. State, 137 So. 3d 1075, 2014 WL 1052351, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

137 So. 3d 1075 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. Junior
259 So. 3d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Lee v. State
257 So. 3d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Rua-Torbizco v. State
255 So. 3d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Morgan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Lopez v. State
189 So. 3d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Charlemagne v. State
185 So. 3d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Denson v. State
143 So. 3d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)