Morgan v. State

414 So. 2d 233, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20013
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 4, 1982·No. No. 82-678·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), has taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The motion to vacate, the files and record in this case fail to conclusively show the petitioner is not entitled to relief, and he is therefore entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 3.850 motion. See, Francis v. State, 413 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1982), 7 FLW 186; Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977); Cole v. State, 181 So.2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Holzapfel v. State, 120 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Reversed and remanded for evidentiary hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. State, 414 So. 2d 233, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20013 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

414 So. 2d 233 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan v. State
471 So. 2d 1336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)