Morgan v. Springer

12 A.D.2d 626, 208 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6702
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover amounts allegedly due under a separation agreement between plaintiff and defendant, formerly husband and wife, in which the [627]*627complaint pleads two causes of action, the defendant husband appeals: (1) from so much of an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated June 30, 1959, as grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the second cause of action, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated July 29, 1959, denying his motion for reargument. Order, dated June 30, 1959, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs; and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the second cause of action, denied. Although defendant’s affidavits fail to state facts which would constitute a defense to the causes of action alleged against him, plaintiff’s affidavit and the other affidavit and papers submitted are insufficient to warrant the court, as a matter of law, in directing judgment in favor of plaintiff as to the second cause of action (see Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Appeal from order, dated July 29, 1959, denying reargument, dismissed, without costs, as academic. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. Springer, 12 A.D.2d 626, 208 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

12 A.D.2d 626 (Morgan v. Springer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burton v. Ertel
107 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)