Morgan v. Smith

102 S.W. 673, 125 Mo. App. 238, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 93
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 6, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.W. 673 (Morgan v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Smith, 102 S.W. 673, 125 Mo. App. 238, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 93 (Mo. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

BROADDUS, P. J.

Both parties appealed from the judgment of the court. Neither party files an abstract. The defendant besides bringing a transcript of the judgment and order granting an appeal has fur[239]*239nisbed a copy of tbe pleadings and bill of exceptions. There is nothing to show by the record proper that any motion for a new trial was ever filed. Such being the case, there is nothing before the court but the pleadings and the judgment. And furthermore there is nothing to show, except in the bill of exceptions, that: said motion was ever filed. This case is like that of the City of St. Charles ex rel. v. Deemar, 174 Mo. 122.

Finding no error in the record proper, the cause is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
138 S.W. 663 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.W. 673, 125 Mo. App. 238, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-smith-moctapp-1907.