Morgan v. Santana
This text of 188 A.D.2d 1047 (Morgan v. Santana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memo-
randum: Petitioner mother sought custody of the parties’ eight-year-old daughter based upon allegations that respondent father was sexually abusing the child. Following a hearing, the court determined that petitioner’s allegations of sexual abuse were unfounded and that it would be in the best interest of the child for her to remain in respondent’s custody.
Upon our review of the record, we conclude that petitioner failed to demonstrate that respondent was guilty of sexually abusing their child. Thus, Family Court properly dismissed the petition.
There is no merit to petitioner’s further contention that the Law Guardian was biased or that her recommendation influenced the court into making an erroneous determination. (Appeal from Order of Herkimer County Family Court, Bergin, J. — Custody.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-santana-nyappdiv-1992.