Morgan v. Robertson
This text of 39 So. 2d 9 (Morgan v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding under §§ 279, 280, Title 7, Code of 1940, for supersedeas and the vacation of judgment by default rendered against the petitioner on the ground that he was prevented from making his defense by surprise, accident, mistake or fraud, without fault on his part.
The issues presented by the petition for supersedeas were contested and the case was submitted on the pleadings and the testimony taken ore tenus. The petition was denied. This appeal is from the judgment denying the petition.
The evidence adduced clearly warranted the conclusion that the petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof by showing that said judgment was entered without fault or negligence on his part. Ex parte New Home Sewing Machine Co., 238 Ala. 159, 189 So. 874; Southern Railway Co. v. Cleveland, 163 Ala. 470, 50 So. 122; Ex parte Walker, 54 Ala. 577; Traub v. Fabian, 160 Ala. 210, 49 So. 240; Evans v. Wilhite, 167 Ala. 587, 52 So. 845, 846; Todd v. Leslie, 171 Ala. 624, 55 So. 174.
We find no error in the record.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 So. 2d 9, 251 Ala. 583, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-robertson-ala-1949.