Morgan v. Plantation-Sysco

471 So. 2d 207, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1569, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 1985·No. No. 84-668·Published

Opinion

COBB, Chief Judge.

The appellant, James E. Morgan, raises issues on this appeal relating to the admissibility at trial of deposition testimony of an unavailable witness and agency, which we find to be without merit. We agree, however, with his contention that the trial court erred in awarding costs 1 without affording him the opportunity “to object ... or to present evidence and argument in contravention of the items claimed as costs.” Southern Shipping Co. v. Flagship First National Bank of Miami Beach, 366 So.2d 855, 856 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b). The appellee has conceded this error.

We affirm except as to the cost award and remand for hearing on that issue.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. Plantation-Sysco, 471 So. 2d 207, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1569, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

471 So. 2d 207 (Morgan v. Plantation-Sysco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Shipping Co. v. Flagship First National Bank of Miami Beach
366 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)