Morgan v. Plantation-Sysco
This text of 471 So. 2d 207 (Morgan v. Plantation-Sysco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, James E. Morgan, raises issues on this appeal relating to the admissibility at trial of deposition testimony of an unavailable witness and agency, which we find to be without merit. We agree, however, with his contention that the trial court erred in awarding costs 1 without affording him the opportunity “to object ... or to present evidence and argument in contravention of the items claimed as costs.” Southern Shipping Co. v. Flagship First National Bank of Miami Beach, 366 So.2d 855, 856 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b). The appellee has conceded this error.
We affirm except as to the cost award and remand for hearing on that issue.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 So. 2d 207, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1569, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-plantation-sysco-fladistctapp-1985.