Morgan v. Morgan
This text of 31 A. 130 (Morgan v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming, as we must in cases such as this, that the averments of fact contained in the affidavit of defence are true, the court was right in holding that there is enough in defendant’s affidavit to carry the case to the jury; and hence there was no [453]*453error in discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.
Appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by plaintiff, but without prejudice, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A. 130, 166 Pa. 450, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-morgan-pa-1895.