Morgan v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Morgan v. Morgan

31 A. 130, 166 Pa. 450, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1226

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 25, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 122·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Assuming, as we must in cases such as this, that the averments of fact contained in the affidavit of defence are true, the court was right in holding that there is enough in defendant’s affidavit to carry the case to the jury; and hence there was no [453] error in discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

Appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by plaintiff, but without prejudice, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Assuming, as we must in cases such as this, that the averments of fact contained in the affidavit of defence are true, the court was right in holding that there is enough in defendant’s affidavit to carry the case to the jury; and hence there was no [453] error in discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

Appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by plaintiff, but without prejudice, etc.

Morgan v. Morgan, 31 A. 130, 166 Pa. 450, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1226 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

31 A. 130 (Morgan v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related