Morgan v. Morgan

31 A. 130, 166 Pa. 450, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1226
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 25, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 122
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 A. 130 (Morgan v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Morgan, 31 A. 130, 166 Pa. 450, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1226 (Pa. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Assuming, as we must in cases such as this, that the averments of fact contained in the affidavit of defence are true, the court was right in holding that there is enough in defendant’s affidavit to carry the case to the jury; and hence there was no [453]*453error in discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

Appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by plaintiff, but without prejudice, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Titche v. Hiller
5 La. App. 375 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Succession of Roth
12 Teiss. 168 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A. 130, 166 Pa. 450, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-morgan-pa-1895.