Morgan v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morgan v. Morgan

105 A.D.2d 1080, 482 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 1080 (Morgan v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morgan v. Morgan, 105 A.D.2d 1080, 482 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In this divorce action Special Term properly denied visitation rights to plaintiff until his paternity of the children, born to defendant while she was married to another, was duly established (see Domestic Relations Law, § 240; Family Ct Act, § 511; see, also, Family Ct Act, § 447). The legitimacy of these children is presumed. The prior nonappealed Family Court order of protection which made provision for plaintiff to visit these children was unauthorized and invalid and in any event expired [1081]*1081on May 10,1984, one year after its issuance (see Family Ct Act, § 842). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J. — visitation.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In this divorce action Special Term properly denied visitation rights to plaintiff until his paternity of the children, born to defendant while she was married to another, was duly established (see Domestic Relations Law, § 240; Family Ct Act, § 511; see, also, Family Ct Act, § 447). The legitimacy of these children is presumed. The prior nonappealed Family Court order of protection which made provision for plaintiff to visit these children was unauthorized and invalid and in any event expired [1081]*1081on May 10,1984, one year after its issuance (see Family Ct Act, § 842). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J. — visitation.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 1080, 482 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-morgan-nyappdiv-1984.