Morgan v. Morgan

309 S.W.3d 406, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 524, 2010 WL 1655891
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 2010·No. WD 71546·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lisa M. Morgan (“Mother”) appeals from the Platte County trial court’s Second Amended Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage (“Second Amended Judgment”), which, among other things, awarded Christopher P. Morgan (“Father”) the residential address for mailing and educational purposes for the children, and adopted the proposed parenting plan set forth by Father, with minor changes. Mother con *407 tends that: (1) the trial court erred by adopting Father’s Proposed Parenting Plan, with minor changes, as set forth in the Second Amended Judgment; (2) the trial court abused its discretion by not allowing Mother to offer a revised parenting plan; (3) the trial court erred because it failed to make written findings in the Second Amended Judgment regarding the rejection of Mother’s First Amended Parenting Plan; and (4) the trial court erred in designating Father’s address as the children’s address for mailing and education purposes. We affirm. 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. Morgan, 309 S.W.3d 406, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 524, 2010 WL 1655891 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

309 S.W.3d 406 (Morgan v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Radley
309 S.W.3d 406 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)