Morgan v. Morgan

21 S.W.2d 653, 231 Ky. 420, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 289
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedNovember 8, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 21 S.W.2d 653 (Morgan v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Morgan, 21 S.W.2d 653, 231 Ky. 420, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 289 (Ky. 1929).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner—

Reversing.

Elva Morgan appeals from a judgment denying her an absolute divorce.

On April 18,1925, Robert P. Morgan and Miss Elva Mosley were married. On August 5, 1927, Robert P. Morgan filed suit against Elva Morgan for divorce, charging she had left him on December 15,1926, and that about that time she became guilty of such lewd and lascivious conduct and behavior as proved her to be unchaste.

Morgan never withdrew this charge. He endeavored to prove it and failed utterly. When he completed his *421 proof in Nov. 1927, he knew this charge was groundless yet he persisted in. the assertion of it until judgment in August, 1928, a period of more than six months.

For answer, Elva Morgan traversed the petition, and made a counterclaim for divorce upon the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. We have often written that the making hy a husband of a deliberate and unfounded charge of unchastity and lewd and- lascivious conduct against his wife was such cruel and inhuman treatment as would afford her grounds for a divorce. Her other evidence of cruelty was meager but it with this charge of unchastity was enough. She. was entitled to the relief sought. Smith v. Smith, 181 Ky. 55, 203 S. W. 884; Johnson v. Johnson, 183 Ky. 421, 209 S. W. 385; Nichols v. Nichols, 189 Ky. 500, 225 S. W. 147. See, also, 9 R. C. L. 345, and 19 C. J. 51.

We have said, however, that it is not such grounds where the husband makes such a charge in good faith with reasonable basis for so doing (see Sallee v. Sallee, 213 Ky. 125, 280 S. W. 932) but we can hardly imagine a case where such a charge would be more groundless than this one.

The chancellor should have given Mrs. Morgan an absolute divorce, and the judgment is reversed, with directions so to do.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiggins v. Wiggins
104 S.W.2d 1097 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)
Burns v. Burns
77 S.W.2d 418 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
Hartkemeier v. Hartkemeier
59 S.W.2d 1014 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)
Bush v. Bush
53 S.W.2d 352 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Austin v. Austin
50 S.W.2d 9 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Perkins v. Perkins
44 S.W.2d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Grove v. Grove
39 S.W.2d 193 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.W.2d 653, 231 Ky. 420, 1929 Ky. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-morgan-kyctapphigh-1929.