Morgan v. Morgan

932 So. 2d 298, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2006 WL 12980
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 2006
DocketNo. 2D05-2819
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 So. 2d 298 (Morgan v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Morgan, 932 So. 2d 298, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2006 WL 12980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order, entered on remand from the parties’ earlier appeal, which imposes a lien on a portion of Michael Morgan’s assets in favor of Marilyn Morgan as replacement security for Michael Morgan’s alimony obligation. However, we remand to the trial court to strike the finding that the security obligation can be construed as lump sum alimony because that finding is outside the scope of our earlier remand and unnecessary to the order.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with directions.

SALCINES and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dubois v. State
932 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
932 So. 2d 298, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2006 WL 12980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-morgan-fladistctapp-2006.