Morgan v. Morgan
932 So. 2d 298, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2006 WL 12980
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 2006·No. No. 2D05-2819·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order, entered on remand from the parties’ earlier appeal, which imposes a lien on a portion of Michael Morgan’s assets in favor of Marilyn Morgan as replacement security for Michael Morgan’s alimony obligation. However, we remand to the trial court to strike the finding that the security obligation can be construed as lump sum alimony because that finding is outside the scope of our earlier remand and unnecessary to the order.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. Morgan, 932 So. 2d 298, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2006 WL 12980 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
932 So. 2d 298 (Morgan v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dubois v. State
932 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)