Morgan v. Meuth

27 N.W. 509, 60 Mich. 238, 1886 Mich. LEXIS 580
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 8, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 27 N.W. 509 (Morgan v. Meuth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Meuth, 27 N.W. 509, 60 Mich. 238, 1886 Mich. LEXIS 580 (Mich. 1886).

Opinion

Morse, J.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed to •establish complainant’s right to an alley in the property ■known as the “ Buchoz Block,” in Ann Arbor.

The Buchoz block consists of four stores fronting nearly west on Detroit street. The alley in question is about twelve feet wide, and is immediately north and adjoining the block, [246]*246and extends east to the rear end of the lot upon which the-block is built.

The Buchoz block is located on the Kenneth-Davidson plat of subdivision of lot 3, in block No. 3, north of Huron, street, in range 6 east, in Ann Arbor. The lots in this block are eight by twelve rods. The Bent house property is located immediately south and adjoining the block. The Meuth lot-is located immediately north and adjoining the block.

Between the Bent property and the Buchoz block is a strip-of land ten feet wide, reaching the whole distance from Detroit sti-eet to the east end of the original lot. North of this strip, and adjoining it, is an alley platted three feet wide. This alley was platted for the use and benefit of the-lots composing the Buchoz block, and for no other purpose.

From April, 1860, until his death, in October, 1874, Louis-It. Buchoz owned, in fee simple, the Buchoz block, the Bent property, and the land now owned and occupied by the-defendant, Meuth.

In March, 1865, Louis R. Buchoz executed a mortgage upon the Bent property to his divorced wife, Caroline Buchoz,. with the privilege of a right of way, and of passing and repassing from Detroit street to the east end of said land,, over and along such alley or passage-way as may be provided for that purpose, by closing immediately after passing, and-keeping closed, sueli gates as may be placed in it, and not obstructing the alley.”

On the second day of January, 1868, Buchoz gave the complainant a mortgage covering the land described in the-mortgage to his wife, except the north eight feet of lot 2, and in addition thereto, embracing the Buchoz block, and the strip between said block and the Bent property, and two rods not contained in the mortgage to Caroline, being the east two rods in width from off the Bent property. No-right of way was granted, in terms, by this mortgage.

Complainant, at the time of filing her bill, owned the-property covered by these two mortgages, having acquired the same by foreclosure.

The defendant owns the land lying north and adjoining

[0]*0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randy Hildebrant v. Shannon Badgero
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018
Slatterly v. Madiol
668 N.W.2d 154 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2003)
Burk v. Tyrrell
91 S.E.2d 744 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Harr v. Coolbaugh
59 N.W.2d 132 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1953)
Von Meding v. Strahl
30 N.W.2d 363 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1948)
Levy v. Dossin's Food Products
72 F. Supp. 855 (W.D. Michigan, 1947)
Milewski v. Wolski
22 N.W.2d 831 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1946)
State v. Parker
137 P.2d 626 (Utah Supreme Court, 1943)
Stewart v. Hunt
5 N.W.2d 737 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1942)
Dimoff v. Laboroff
296 N.W. 275 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)
Waubun Beach Ass'n v. Wilson
265 N.W. 474 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Burling v. Leiter
262 N.W. 388 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Rodal v. Crawford
261 N.W. 260 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Bubser v. Ranguette
257 N.W. 845 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Bricault v. Cavanaugh
245 N.W. 573 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)
Zemon v. Netzorg
226 N.W. 242 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1929)
Michelet v. Cole
149 P. 310 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1915)
Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.
137 N.W. 791 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Bean v. Bean
128 N.W. 413 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 N.W. 509, 60 Mich. 238, 1886 Mich. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-meuth-mich-1886.