Morgan v. Mastick
17 F. Cas. 752, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 521
This text of 17 F. Cas. 752 (Morgan v. Mastick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Morgan v. Mastick, 17 F. Cas. 752, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 521 (N.D. Ohio 1869).
Opinion
held that the decision in 8 Mete. [Mass.] 377, was a correct statement of the law of the case, and as such read it in full to the jury.
The jury could not agree as to the intent; while all were unanimous as to the defendant being insolvent, ten of them regarded the intent as fraudulent, and two that it was not. They were therefore discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Macon Grocery Co. v. Beach
156 F. 1009 (S.D. Georgia, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 752, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-mastick-ohnd-1869.