Morgan v. Mandish Research International, Inc.

913 So. 2d 1248, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17707, 2005 WL 3001487
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-4207
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 913 So. 2d 1248 (Morgan v. Mandish Research International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Mandish Research International, Inc., 913 So. 2d 1248, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17707, 2005 WL 3001487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the statement of evidence prepared by appellant was not agreed upon by appellee or approved by the judge of compensation claims, ás required by Florida Appellate Rule Procedure 9.200(b)(4), the order granting the employer/servicing agent’s motion to enforce settlement agreement is AFFIRMED. See Walt v. Walt, 596 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

ERVIN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Agee v. AGE INSTITUTE OF FLORIDA, INC.
913 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 So. 2d 1248, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17707, 2005 WL 3001487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-mandish-research-international-inc-fladistctapp-2005.