Morgan v. Mandish Research International, Inc.
913 So. 2d 1248, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17707, 2005 WL 3001487
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 10, 2005·No. No. 1D04-4207·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the statement of evidence prepared by appellant was not agreed upon by appellee or approved by the judge of compensation claims, ás required by Florida Appellate Rule Procedure 9.200(b)(4), the order granting the employer/servicing agent’s motion to enforce settlement agreement is AFFIRMED. See Walt v. Walt, 596 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. Mandish Research International, Inc., 913 So. 2d 1248, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17707, 2005 WL 3001487 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
913 So. 2d 1248 (Morgan v. Mandish Research International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Agee v. AGE INSTITUTE OF FLORIDA, INC.
913 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)