Morgan v. Love
This text of 34 A. 43 (Morgan v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s right to recover in this case depended on questions of fact which were clearly for the jury. They were fairly submitted by the learned trial judge with instructions which appear to be fully adequate and free from error; and the controlling facts were found, as the verdict necessarily implies, in favor of the plaintiff. Considered in connection with other portions of the charge, the excerpts recited in the specifications of error are neither inaccurate nor misleading. There is nothing in either of them that requires further notice. They are both dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 43, 173 Pa. 444, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-love-pa-1896.