Morgan v. Laurent
This text of 3 A.D.3d 556 (Morgan v. Laurent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated December 6, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
We reverse the Supreme Court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, since there are triable issues of fact as to whether the conduct of the defendant Randolph Laurent contributed to the cause of the subject motor vehicle accident (see Romano v 202 Corp., 305 AD2d 576). Florio, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.3d 556, 770 N.Y.S.2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-laurent-nyappdiv-2004.