Morgan v. Ingalls
This text of 281 A.D. 1016 (Morgan v. Ingalls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under all the circumstances we think any allowance to the respondent Rosenblatt in excess of the sum of $10,000 was unwarranted. Supplemental judgment unanimously modified by [1017]*1017reducing the allowance to the respondent, Sol A. Rosenblatt, contained in paragraph numbered 4(d) thereof, to the sum of $10,000 and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 1016, 121 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-ingalls-nyappdiv-1953.