Morgan v. Hannah's Lessee

1 Thompson 44, 1 Shan. Cas. 28
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 1 Thompson 44 (Morgan v. Hannah's Lessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Hannah's Lessee, 1 Thompson 44, 1 Shan. Cas. 28 (Tenn. 1849).

Opinion

This was an action of ejectment brought by Hannah’s Lessee, against the three Morgan’s tenants in common of certain real estate. Judgment below for the plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court, and two of them perfected their appeal by taking the pauper oath, while the third, failed either to give bond or to take the pauper oath.

Trewhitt entered a motion to dismiss the appeal as to all of the appellants.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as to the one who had not complied with the law; but decided that the other two were properly in Court, and discharged the motion as to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Johnson
188 So. 3d 291 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
State v. Moody
178 So. 3d 1031 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State of Louisiana v. Diwarn R. Bradford
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011
Flagler v. Wessman
263 N.E.2d 630 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1970)
Suing v. Catton
254 N.E.2d 806 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1970)
O'Brien v. Country Mutual Insurance
245 N.E.2d 30 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1969)
Devlin v. Wantroba
218 N.E.2d 496 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1966)
Terrill v. City of Chicago
219 N.E.2d 705 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1966)
Wert v. Burke
197 N.E.2d 717 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1964)
Vroom v. Curtiss
116 P.2d 438 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
Hamburger v. Economy Department Store
222 N.W. 603 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1928)
Hulse v. Nash
163 N.E. 792 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1928)
Frazier v. Ray
219 P. 492 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1923)
Adams v. Morehead
186 N.W. 830 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)
Trotter v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.
98 S.E. 621 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1919)
Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Cox
150 S.W. 265 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Leonard v. Garland
96 N.E. 819 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1911)
Drainage Commissioners of Drainage District No. 2 v. Kinney
84 N.E. 34 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1908)
Wells v. Patton
50 Kan. 732 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Thompson 44, 1 Shan. Cas. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-hannahs-lessee-tenn-1849.