Morgan v. Guardianship of Turgeon

724 So. 2d 175, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 69, 1999 WL 2803
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 1999
DocketNo. 98-3809
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 724 So. 2d 175 (Morgan v. Guardianship of Turgeon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Guardianship of Turgeon, 724 So. 2d 175, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 69, 1999 WL 2803 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mary Morgan (Petitioner), the limited guardian for her elderly aunt, Ruth Turgeon, filed a petition to determine incapacity seeking to have a plenary guardian appointed. Rather than appointing an examining committee within five days pursuant to section 744.331(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), the trial court treated the petition as a “suggestion of further incapacity of the ward” and proceeded to appoint one physician to examine the ward within twenty days, by analogy with section 744.464, Florida Statutes (1997), which provides for the restoration of one or more rights after an interested person files a suggestion of capacity. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the circuit court to follow the dictates of section 744.331.1

We grant the petition. See § 744.369(8) (additional authority may not be granted to guardian without a hearing as provided for in section 744.331); Robert P. Scheb, Guardian of the Person: Duties, Responsibilities, and Liabilities, in Florida Guardianship PRACTICE (The Florida Bar 3d ed.1998) § 14.23 (“[I]f the guardian believes that action should be taken that requires that additional rights of the ward be removed, the entire procedure to determine incapacity (see F.S. 744.331) must be repeated. F.S. 744.369(8).”). However, we withhold issuance of the writ, trusting that the circuit court judge will appoint a three-member examining committee pursuant to section 744.331 forthwith.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Molnar v. Maltz
786 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 So. 2d 175, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 69, 1999 WL 2803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-guardianship-of-turgeon-fladistctapp-1999.