Morgan v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morgan v. Friedman

241 A.D. 787

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 787 (Morgan v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morgan v. Friedman, 241 A.D. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one action, and verdicts reinstated. Motion for new trial in each case denied, with ten dollars costs in one action. Defendants moved for a new trial of each case on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The evidence concerned an issue litigated on the trial. It is largely cumulative, and there is no reasonable probability it would change the result, in view of the new evidence offered in opposition. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one action, and verdicts reinstated. Motion for new trial in each case denied, with ten dollars costs in one action. Defendants moved for a new trial of each case on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The evidence concerned an issue litigated on the trial. It is largely cumulative, and there is no reasonable probability it would change the result, in view of the new evidence offered in opposition. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-friedman-nyappdiv-1934.