Morgan v. Farmers' Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Morgan v. Farmers' Bank

3 Pen. & W. 391

DecidedMay 15, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pen. & W. 391 (Morgan v. Farmers' Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morgan v. Farmers' Bank, 3 Pen. & W. 391 (Pa. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It would not be easy to devise a more neat, perspicuous and complete form of statement, than the one which is the subject of this writ of error; and it is not a little strange that exceptions of this stamp, should be repeated after the decision in Boyd v. Gordon, 6 Serg. &r Rawle, 53. Reed v. Pedan, S Serg. &r Rawle, 265. Bucle v. Nicholas, id. 316. Cook v. Gilbert, id. 567, and Bailey v. Bailey, 14 Serg. &? Rawle, 195. We are not aware that any thing in the assignment of error calls for further remark.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It would not be easy to devise a more neat, perspicuous and complete form of statement, than the one which is the subject of this writ of error; and it is not a little strange that exceptions of this stamp, should be repeated after the decision in Boyd v. Gordon, 6 Serg. &r Rawle, 53. Reed v. Pedan, S Serg. &r Rawle, 265. Bucle v. Nicholas, id. 316. Cook v. Gilbert, id. 567, and Bailey v. Bailey, 14 Serg. &? Rawle, 195. We are not aware that any thing in the assignment of error calls for further remark.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Pen. & W. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-farmers-bank-pa-1832.