Morgan v. England
1 Wright 112, 1 Ohio Ch. 112
Opinion
Usurious contracts have never been rendered void in Ohio; the authorities cited are applicable to contracts made void by the usury laws of other countries, and have no application here. But if otherwise, the matter set up in the bill might have availed the party at law, if the law made the contract void, as contended. Having neglected to make the defence there, he cannot, without excuse, come here to set it up.
The bill is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. England, 1 Wright 112, 1 Ohio Ch. 112 (Ohio 1832).
1 Wright 112 (Morgan v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quigley v. Commonwealth
84 Pa. 18 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1877)
McCue v. Commonwealth
78 Pa. 185 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1875)