Morgan v. England

Ohio Supreme Court

Morgan v. England

1 Wright 112, 1 Ohio Ch. 112

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1832

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Wright 112 (Morgan v. England) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morgan v. England, 1 Wright 112, 1 Ohio Ch. 112 (Ohio 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

Usurious contracts have never been rendered void in Ohio; the authorities cited are applicable to contracts made void by the usury laws of other countries, and have no application here. But if otherwise, the matter set up in the bill might have availed the party at law, if the law made the contract void, as contended. Having neglected to make the defence there, he cannot, without excuse, come here to set it up.

The bill is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

Usurious contracts have never been rendered void in Ohio; the authorities cited are applicable to contracts made void by the usury laws of other countries, and have no application here. But if otherwise, the matter set up in the bill might have availed the party at law, if the law made the contract void, as contended. Having neglected to make the defence there, he cannot, without excuse, come here to set it up.

The bill is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 112, 1 Ohio Ch. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-england-ohio-1832.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack