Morgan v. Eberhardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morgan v. Eberhardt

48 A.D.2d 904, 372 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10172

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 1975·Published

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 26, 1974, as granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for leave to serve an amended answer, to the extent of granting such leave. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. Although we affirm Special Term’s exercise of discretion in permitting service of an amended answer, we do not reach the merits of the allegations contained in the proposed affirmative defenses. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 26, 1974, as granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for leave to serve an amended answer, to the extent of granting such leave. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. Although we affirm Special Term’s exercise of discretion in permitting service of an amended answer, we do not reach the merits of the allegations contained in the proposed affirmative defenses. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Morgan v. Eberhardt, 48 A.D.2d 904, 372 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

48 A.D.2d 904 (Morgan v. Eberhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.