Morgan v. Director of Patuxent Institution
This text of 204 A.2d 553 (Morgan v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency the applicant raises contentions all of which are without merit, and are answered by prior decisions in Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Gee v. Director, 231 Md. 610; Porter v. Director, 232 Md. 639, and Pierson v. Director, 235 Md. 654. The crimes for which he was sentenced were enough to bring him within the provisions of sub-sections 1 and 5 of section 6(a) of Article 31B, and we think the report of Patuxent supports the finding of defective delinquency.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.2d 553, 236 Md. 643, 1964 Md. LEXIS 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1964.