Morgan v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Morgan v. Director of Patuxent Institution

204 A.2d 553, 236 Md. 643, 1964 Md. LEXIS 957

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 16, 1964·No. App. No. 59·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency the applicant raises contentions all of which are without merit, and are answered by prior decisions in Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Gee v. Director, 231 Md. 610; Porter v. Director, 232 Md. 639, and Pierson v. Director, 235 Md. 654. The crimes for which he was sentenced were enough to bring him within the provisions of sub-sections 1 and 5 of section 6(a) of Article 31B, and we think the report of Patuxent supports the finding of defective delinquency.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency the applicant raises contentions all of which are without merit, and are answered by prior decisions in Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Gee v. Director, 231 Md. 610; Porter v. Director, 232 Md. 639, and Pierson v. Director, 235 Md. 654. The crimes for which he was sentenced were enough to bring him within the provisions of sub-sections 1 and 5 of section 6(a) of Article 31B, and we think the report of Patuxent supports the finding of defective delinquency.

Application denied.

Morgan v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 204 A.2d 553, 236 Md. 643, 1964 Md. LEXIS 957 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

204 A.2d 553 (Morgan v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related