Morgan v. City of Dubuque

28 Iowa 575
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 8, 1870·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Williams, J.

-The plaintiff built a sidewalk for the city of Dubuque, which was to be paid for when the city collected the cost of it from the owners of the adjoining lots. The jury returned a special verdict, finding that the work was done, the amount due, and that the city had not collected from the abutting owners the cost of the sidewalk; and that the city had not shown, by the evidence, that within a reasonable time after the completion of the work it did all that was reasonably within its power to collect the assessment upon the lot owners for the building of the sidewalk in question.

Under the contract with plaintiff, the city was bound to collect the assessments within a reasonable time after the work was done, and pay the plaintiff. A failure to do so would render the city liable to pay the stipulated price for the walk. The burden of proof of diligence rests upon the city. 1 Greenleaf, § 79. The judgment on the verdict is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan v. City of Dubuque, 28 Iowa 575 (iowa 1870).

28 Iowa 575 (Morgan v. City of Dubuque) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. City of Casper
45 P.2d 1 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1935)
Rogers v. City of Omaha
117 N.W. 119 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1908)
Jones v. City of Portland
58 P. 657 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)
German-American Savings Bank v. City of Spokane
38 L.R.A. 259 (Washington Supreme Court, 1897)
District of Columbia v. Lyon
161 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Oster v. City of Jefferson
57 Mo. App. 485 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
Lyon v. District of Columbia
20 D.C. 484 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1892)
Aylesworth v. Gratiot County
43 F. 350 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1889)