Morgan v. Blackwell
This text of 334 S.E.2d 817 (Morgan v. Blackwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant Polly S. Morgan appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent Sandra Broome Blackwell. We reverse and remand.
In June 1981, respondent and her husband contracted with appellant Morgan to cut timber on Morgan’s land. At that time, Sandra Broome Blackwell was 17 years old.
Two months after respondent’s 18th birthday, appellant commenced this action for breach of contract. Respondent moved for a summary judgment on the single ground that the contract was void ab initio. The trial judge granted respondent’s motion, ruling a contract entered into by a minor is void ab initio.1 This ruling was erroneous.
South Carolina precedent clearly holds a contract entered into by a minor merely voidable, rather than void ab initio. Parks v. Lyons, 219 S. C. 40, 64 S. E. (2d) 123 (1951).
Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 S.E.2d 817, 286 S.C. 457, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-blackwell-sc-1985.