Morgan v. Blackiston
5 H. & J. 61
Opinion
was of opinion, that the bond, on which the action was brought, could not be made to embrace any ether judgment than the one it recited; and as the judgment admitted by the case stated to have been obtained by the appellant against Davis, was rendered at April term 1801, of the general court, and the ene recited in the bond is of September term 1801, they thought the judgment below ought to be affirmed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. Blackiston, 5 H. & J. 61 (Md. 1820).
5 H. & J. 61 (Morgan v. Blackiston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eakle v. Smith
27 Md. 467 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1867)
Tucker v. State ex rel. Kneighton
11 Md. 322 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1857)