Morgan v. Blackiston

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Morgan v. Blackiston

5 H. & J. 61

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 15, 1820

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 H. & J. 61 (Morgan v. Blackiston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morgan v. Blackiston, 5 H. & J. 61 (Md. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The court

was of opinion, that the bond, on which the action was brought, could not be made to embrace any ether judgment than the one it recited; and as the judgment admitted by the case stated to have been obtained by the appellant against Davis, was rendered at April term 1801, of the general court, and the ene recited in the bond is of September term 1801, they thought the judgment below ought to be affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court

was of opinion, that the bond, on which the action was brought, could not be made to embrace any ether judgment than the one it recited; and as the judgment admitted by the case stated to have been obtained by the appellant against Davis, was rendered at April term 1801, of the general court, and the ene recited in the bond is of September term 1801, they thought the judgment below ought to be affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 H. & J. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-blackiston-md-1820.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack