Morgan v. Barham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Morgan v. Barham

1931 OK 192, 5 P.2d 761, 148 Okla. 273, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 887

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 28, 1931·No. 19946·Published

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the *274 same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 199-39, this day decided,, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this ease, together with others, was consolidated.

The. judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWXNDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, J.T., concur. CLARK, V. C. L, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the *274 same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 199-39, this day decided,, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this ease, together with others, was consolidated.

The. judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWXNDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, J.T., concur. CLARK, V. C. L, not participating.

Morgan v. Barham, 1931 OK 192, 5 P.2d 761, 148 Okla. 273, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 887 (Okla. 1931).

Pincite

1931 OK 192 (Morgan v. Barham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related