Morgan v. Barham

1931 OK 192, 5 P.2d 761, 148 Okla. 273, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 887
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 28, 1931
Docket19946
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK 192 (Morgan v. Barham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Barham, 1931 OK 192, 5 P.2d 761, 148 Okla. 273, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 887 (Okla. 1931).

Opinion

RILEY, J.

In this case substantially the *274 same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 199-39, this day decided,, 148 Okla. 255, 298 Pac. 611, with which this ease, together with others, was consolidated.

The. judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWXNDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, J.T., concur. CLARK, V. C. L, not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White Oak Refining Co. v. Whitehead
1931 OK 357 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
En-Le-Te-Ke v. Beasley
1931 OK 176 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK 192, 5 P.2d 761, 148 Okla. 273, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-barham-okla-1931.