Morgan v. Automobile Financing Inc.

178 S.E. 721, 180 Ga. 394, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 267
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 19, 1935
DocketNo. 10267
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 178 S.E. 721 (Morgan v. Automobile Financing Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Automobile Financing Inc., 178 S.E. 721, 180 Ga. 394, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 267 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

1. By consent of the attorney for plaintiff in the equity suit the judge allowed the defendant to assume the burden of proof on the issue as to whether the contract should be reformed, and thereby to obtain the right to open and conclude the argument before the jury. Held, that there was no error in this ruling.

2. In virtue of such assumption of the burden of proof by the defendant as set forth in the first note, the judge erred in charging the jury in such manner as to impose upon the plaintiff Morgan the burden of proof on the issue of reforming the contract. See Code of 1910, § 5746; Code of 1933, § 38-103; Simmons v. Brannen, 155 Ga. 494 (117 S. E. 318).

Judgment reversed.

All Ihe Justices concur. Aaron Kraviich, for plaintiff in error. Hester, Lewis & Clark, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitehead v. Seymour
169 S.E.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Thomas v. Case
66 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 S.E. 721, 180 Ga. 394, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-automobile-financing-inc-ga-1935.