Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc.

18 A.D.3d 519, 794 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5033

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.3d 519 (Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc., 18 A.D.3d 519, 794 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5033 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to [520]*520recover damages for breach of an alleged sublease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated May 26, 2004, as granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties never entered into a binding sublease (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506 [1979]; 71 Main St. Assoc. v Grosso, 246 AD2d 776 [1998]; see also Rivertower Assoc. v Chalfen, 153 AD2d 196, 197 [1990]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to [520]*520recover damages for breach of an alleged sublease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated May 26, 2004, as granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties never entered into a binding sublease (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506 [1979]; 71 Main St. Assoc. v Grosso, 246 AD2d 776 [1998]; see also Rivertower Assoc. v Chalfen, 153 AD2d 196, 197 [1990]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.3d 519, 794 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-stanley-dw-inc-v-protitle-inc-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack