Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc.

18 A.D.3d 519, 794 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5033

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to [520]*520recover damages for breach of an alleged sublease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated May 26, 2004, as granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The parties never entered into a binding sublease (see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506 [1979]; 71 Main St. Assoc. v Grosso, 246 AD2d 776 [1998]; see also Rivertower Assoc. v Chalfen, 153 AD2d 196, 197 [1990]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc., 18 A.D.3d 519, 794 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5033 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

18 A.D.3d 519 (Morgan Stanley DW, Inc. v. Protitle, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

219 Broadway Corp. v. Alexander's, Inc.
387 N.E.2d 1205 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Rivertower Associates v. Chalfen
153 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
71 Main Street Associates v. Grosso
246 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)