Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

511 U.S. 658, 114 S. Ct. 1827, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 162, 128 L. Ed. 2d 654, 62 U.S.L.W. 4396, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3779, 94 Daily Journal DAR 6827, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3667
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 23, 1994·No. No. 93-609·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance, 511 U.S. 658, 114 S. Ct. 1827, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 162, 128 L. Ed. 2d 654, 62 U.S.L.W. 4396, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3779, 94 Daily Journal DAR 6827, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3667 (1994).

511 U.S. 658 (Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. Collins
162 P.3d 998 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.
912 F. Supp. 1354 (E.D. California, 1995)
Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
514 U.S. 211 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Meyerson v. Wickes Companies, Inc.
882 F. Supp. 1371 (S.D. New York, 1995)
In Re Boesky Securities Litigation
882 F. Supp. 1371 (S.D. New York, 1995)
United States v. Rodney Curtis Hamrick
43 F.3d 877 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)