Morgan, Larry Joe

Opinion

7KC*. A/0. C-m~6l

LarrY JoiThoiLGAM r in TH£ CqukT a F |S< Vi, •V C/vdtwnaL APP&ALs St*Te OFTEXArS r °F ^*** si * Aus Iim D/v/5/6/y

L^^ciS* " viyiw* ^ ;THE. Coo/tT' OF APP6AL?

r COURT OF CRHVilNAL APPEALS

ffcft»l WRIT QF HABEAS £

To THfi Honorable Tuoge of SAis^^m,<** Nouj Comes. Larry "X JTIorga*/ {nfi^W cai^^J pro SC Plavawr and fer/ivigi -this /Ylo+foN -to AbyaNCC. his ILQ1. Wrif of Habeas Corpus and IN Support +ht,r&- of ShoujS :

flpp Ilc an "f fc> riN.g S +fo i's Mo+ Tom +o Aby owee *fh-c flJop-htd fiMdiNqs o-f -¥kc Start's Proposed /fte/tia- (^Miuwi, FinAumus of Fact and Conclusion of Law as +h

UNiiesaLve.b /viat£*ual. facts

C-OH-Ffll &UT/N6 To THB. ILLM&AL COM - -jflL F/n£MbnT£ •&I&" 1 he Applicant Is/has keen deprived O-f the /material he needs In Order -to;•• Support his habeas corpus oppli^cL-fi^M. -Furthert the misrepresenta+iosis Of Counsel as uuell as the Complete tat lure to address the Complaint has left -the Applicant Unakle +Ck shouu -the Carnplaus, e^J of errors•* The Applicant asserts the foiiouj/nc^ issues unresolved and unokAd rased a re e,rro rs an A ?Y)t$. rep r££*£*»&&&• Q+iVm o f -rric^i Counsel *

A, THE °ll\ CALLBK

Counsel misrepresenhed

It CaN Kio+ he Consider ed Sound trial 5frate.~ gyt-ta ai6 f /N+roAuce disinterested party :ujM& fftetftO** +& #&¥**£*, f*<* &*-rry Pn&r^^ "/*'4;3<& 'V field facutal J/vformafioiM disclosing Applicant mas"': In Fact defend In y hlmSel-P Q^ainii if/it aSS%ult ky -the, State's chief CompUlivor ujho uj&t 'the ass ailant in this: matttr.

Applicant is unable "ffe obf«iiu, listen-.+ar or Create a transcript of this caller*

Applicant has presented In -this Section, a materiel fact +h*t Is UtorcsalveA ( anA is misrepresented by TriaJ Counsel as the issues complained of'« Trie I Counsel failed -to h\iVtstiO}CLtc all the 9/f Calls £pe.cfa.fIy the one asserted herein* f u~>hich iuou\d he Cruel el to the issue &-f Se.lt *** defense and also a di sin teres te d third party* for this reason the Court Should ALyance the State's Propose A FF a,uA C L. and amend Sav^e after the revieuj of -the °lll Calls received. Applu;«*M+ Should also have the app&rs+unfry fa FcvieuJ Same 4-$ CnSure proper identify o f the Caller Complained of herein is heard*

6, POLICE IKBPonTs

Trift.1 Counsel asserts that the police repcrts are Generally Inadrnls&ablc in a +r/af* SEE fFCL at Ah*. /fs Not that -the police records LuCre not f/1d4lOM *h> *fcv«#vce. -tor- JLarrs Mora** J»««t ? 04011*51 M&, /*s -Mflf 4/ne. Complainant made S&Verah different Statements uuhlcU wete recorded by the FWP&. The records Could have been used 4a /mpeeck +fa«- vjitNess.es, or k&v?Mg Qv&i^'cNdil */^t official tuhft Cr&a+cjl -K.*. r«.pa**4- ffr%+t qnA -Wis-m Ijsfe/w/Ajg +o the complainant the fact finder luoulJ have b«L£.M lef-f i-urfk Aiof fc/us^/Vv cj **jf»

AdAitiotoa My fTrtal Counsel Could have iNquired £Lout [xjhy FWP& did NOt obtain all the W/tNesses Statements from *hhe ^11 Calls MtoAe*

It Can Nbt be Considered reasona:hle trl^l Strategy i -to Aidf use the matterieuI available made, fey 11».< In vestlaa tlve duthcr ity 4 fo iwt to &aehf or discredit f testimony of witnesses*

C. fclMDEA/ OF PROOF Tibial CouNSel asserts that +here uuoi sio Atee-d for the Applicant to testify because there. LJas Bs/'iAenee, kefore the ^ur\j that Applicants ixJeapon did not Causz, the Victims UJound.s, S££ FF cL at& 43, it Ca^ihiot b>e C*&*isideL<~ ed Competent Vepre.%, iS«$:

Motion to /ltv«A/cc fdr Larr^ Morgan P**e *i Sentait ion to allaiJLj 4he Si-ate to entrer a Com' plafhian-h into th-e record uuho decrlk&s all the Clements neceSSary for the State to obtain a Con\/lctlohi0 {jJhen the State has accomplished the Necessary elements into A-he records, it may then Obtain o\ Conviction #

NO Competent attorney uuauld pceSum-e Ly $ houuinCk tha.t "the V\Aann

b* HasP/TAL R.£Cok.C>S

Triad Counsel failed to u\A have. used the reeords to shouu

/notion -to Akn&nco -for* carry MorojAN P*$e 5 +Ka4 r\pplic ant uuas assaulted t and uuas Ae~ fending hiyy\Selt by the Statements of the Ql\ Caller | and Applicant S-f phoLie of ..-fricul/ CtNd further In- foriv»ft+iGK/ tha,t Could have keen developed haA fnVI CouNst! Codled/ identified th~e CaWer -to tr\oJl.

Had trial CounSt.1 listened , and understoo.d fappUcaivt i Jim W\s description of the €.vent% in auestioi\i t he uuould kn&uun , the Cut £>n -the CoYy^plal want's lec^ ujui Caused by the Cowxplain- ant Sf&wip jVcj Applicant/ the heel of £ompiaiw- «ix»+ foot UJere also iN^urs.d t base on applic ant observation of his Shoe on tke pfto+o - qr^pks, his Counsel Skv> de fcnse of 5 elf ~defe ns c f Aa d d aun Se I pre,* Scnted it to the. ^ury. C^nce detain the, Motion t-o A^v^^ce ror C^r^ rv\or$*n P*9

E. ASK FOK A/EW CTounSBL

It cannot km Considered Sound trial S+rat •— BtCjy to not testify ^° the Only defense Self' Jeferis.fr* S££ FF CL & # V> / Vtf, Y*,SO,

Further more, See K.Scott uJalkcr's affidavit &it /6. After all from day One, he Stuck -to the Sta^\i tkoA he. Cut -the. Victim's pin kit. in (Self - de-Penscj. Applicant ask 4he Court for ncuj Counsel or to, Continue pre Sc- • Further "the Court denied Q^\lcant Counsel* SEE Applicant's (1.0*1 ••©•# I. Its a greater Probcubl It 4y had Not $,LJall

AppW^aKi-f Counsel admitted /m his off- idavf+..SEE Si.WolKtrf5 affidavit ^#^ ?£.*** I dU fevcry4hl.Ng\ +o CONiW/viCt /Wr, /T/o/NSjcrw that he Should N/af testify CouNSel , and ki*> fmv estimator JfRs. Cynthia Tarre?~ , Cav*-c to Applicant iki his holding Cell ixiUh. (Jji^enc\j\ for- the Applicant Not to -testify ai\id also, t Sa^mq If he, did he Could QtA up 4o C^y years). Further t Sck^iiim&j aS the £vid'6Mce. Stood Applicant uuouid iNdeed he fouNd guil4y it ke took, the Stand • Jfls,Torres luent oni 4o Say If VY\r* Udalkcr Say don t fake. th& Stan A,(^Picas el), dont tate. He Stan-d Q trust hiwK uuifh my Iifel P, FmLuile To InV£sTi3fiTa T'he £.ourt adopted -the Stye's cZldwi -thai fiipplieuint fail +& Support la'i& £ la.i'w\ +t\«X.f C-aun Sol / ""fa! / to. fro Vesti a^a te. SB £ FFCL.® M£lt S^, S ST/ $>C ,%lj and Sff,

"TrfaJ c.&unSel w\a.Ae \j**.o feferene.tLj -tUa\f he SouqUt as\i A SpoKe t-c> e$ny cut tresses im Motion to AJivcin&c For i-jav^-i fi\or*><*.** P*Qz, f Ms AFfidav/+. SZE Mr, UJalker affidavit 5) # i * $#~+h rough IL> ApplicaiNii dVd Mdif present evidence to Support the CUJvv\0 lh\s /* because 4m *u1 Counsel fcklieA to enter into Th-e. record t th-c ^li .cfclkr ujkoi Call Lua*> mo4 tslecycd to the Camnpletioni for the. F*ct Finder* Tht> UN biased r and «d1s ii\i t-cr* ehted uuI4nuss. u>cxs a*o4 Called, Uwf&r tun cutely t as a p^\son er ^pplicawf Aas HO Loavf of discover Ina -this uncoiled

uJitNess Nft.w\t- , Nor heuj to Contact herp to* .5«et-.. if this Cruel a,l tuitnesS uiould p>ro- s/lde an affidavits

once o\Qatn due, to the. Manner /ai uuhleh fU-t~ foroceedi'tnci ho, v-e* ~/a te a/ pi lace- $pp Htuin t C&i n not ektaitxi thiS Luitn*a..S 5 S ta^te. m &nt* further mox e / u t i•& a Fee t trio.. \j(Caun 5el) -Failure. to inves.tlaa^te. this 111 Co-Her £wlCa ^ iNForivva+iOw atlouu/ivia, for a Statuary r\akt to Aefend OhJElS Self Thu% Applicant riyht to f defense. uuas denied*

Perhaps the. appointment of &n Attorn-ey yuUrO, CculA Identify tU\%. uultniess i and locete. QnA Canta.et' her ~fsr an a ff IAe^v's t i ujou id Qive tUe. Cour{ uuhc^t it Nieed* * A% li Sets, there /s AJO uuajy Applicant c?an identify C-ontaet and locate th\ s Cruel o^l Cc^llCr*

G* APPLicmJTs c^^rSBcTiON-'s om File with ~t/ual CquiCT

Appli c*™t presents Aio £A/fdcNCe. 4o Support AiS da\«<\ that h-L, £iavc "SuvueS If. ShauJ a Si'ki Card.S££ FfCL © U £9 r £0 and &i Applicant Mdvcr recieved Ail Client "File fror* lam«L H, SJaaajJ'-. . Kfs p,rior * it Luas the duty of applicant corremt attof\ne\j 4o c\et Applicant Client fl l-e * £• U)aA Ker fci\ I to da So.

rA.PttPAKe Fore PuN\Sr\w\tnt

Applicant refused tro discuss p unis Awi en 4 , SEB FV CL. & it £Z., £3, £u &<", & 6, C7„ f^ Coun Se.1 of a pp Meant ko-A -frewv 1I -z l - Z.b /i /hotton to Movancz. for- .M^pv^HOrj^^ ££*&«. /•& ^M+H 3r /£, A0l3> 4o get applicant's Contacts IN for mafroKi t lK\ Fact appll cant s tried On Numerous at Occasions to ge4 counsel tUe iNformOition , applicauf tried CalflNg Counsel t app licant uuro+6 Counsel tujo letters , Applicant Uj\\\ attach these letters as exhibits W', app\\can\ gave~ Counsel his e-nnail user Name and pin Numker ^ applfca»M4 later found Out Coun St. I ha A Sabo4ag«e-a his prtvwa™ e-mail address * /ki Fac-f Only Counstl and Applicant had Kmouj Iedqe. of th\s d-Mail address/ Um4(\ later ^pplic.0^4 gave. J4 to his daug4tv*.r4btrains••fcr—^l'N'-for^VHutien. It Can Not he Considered rco.Sona.hle trio,! SfrflL+egy to ^ ProcrastinateJ , until, the last feuj hours /m the Case to prepare fori ScnTeNcina phase j\Specifically after applicant 4tfld Counsel h\ s list of Con tacts Lutrt CmployerS applicant in as buorlC- c'd 4oir for xtears f anA uuoulA prove Ppp* I\canf are honestly \e.atit) In Fact they arc of all races t -a/m d uuanteA to he, fore Sca* -r -For trio. I broceediria; #-' / kerc is CLo excuse) for CouNSel to Hot a)et TEX tAi's. iMfprmifew • -ffow> 'PprfcMiMT.^- * app.lic*Ae,d /m 4ke. «ius+i'ce System. Mr, £. LjcUfccr' S^oulJ b*. held 4o a h\gk«.r S4cxMdard , an d he ac.cooiM4rA.blc. for Qc4iok» iivi Wc4iw>»'x.*4i'gm of hU clients* Th\s C\cA%e Should he held FVvo%4 (jParajr^ountcy ) Ido\C- l'hg back. om i'4s p«.pcr 4raAl o-f FHr, (jJcd Ler'5 \Profess/oMCL\ Performance of Sub-ferfuae ),/M 4ktS Ca.se* FurtU^r, it is also a fa<- 4 applies + 4aid iMf, uJaJ fCtr hl^> family had 4loo w\*re £>irt dle^rcU 6i kaclcup , aixud uji's^. for hirv to ge.4 due of 4kx..*^ 1 a.^A a4 -the Sawe. T/vwe. lMfor>a KVw family of 4k-c 4r'aJ daft./ a day kfiL-Pore. 4A-C 4n'a.l , toe.ca.usc Applicant /lad /mo tuay of Contactina "the* ,(J5 u4j <^ouMSe./ -flfled 4o do so, r1*p/»u /4 £ctn not &e. Consider- ed rea,sonaL\c -rr/aJ .Strategy tc, uua.lt until the hit min ute to £$e t the IcTtcrs /Vo>~> iTim Skxw references And Contacts. and ^Consider y&u?r- Smlf a £ot*\p>etent attorney cultkout an Cv pla.ina.tit l\Jft-*flOiy *

X. SuPF>OILT£b BY £*ROM K.S. UJalKcr and &,K. bJalkicr- affidavits ' lS^:.. cZrcA'bl*- c*i\t A SupporteA ky -the recorA* JYlO+iOn +0 W6VA/VCC for Larrx, t«\OTC\# L% ^ 70, "jg Luhoj4 bo4h CouNSel* Showed /m their ftffidavi+S is tuho4 4Aey did not do* AW/ 4Ae ll$4 of things they ,d\d not do uuas errors, For \Nitance Not Contacting the ^ll Ca-IICr ujos a.troneous because See 5*u» 4Ae. events as applicant S4a.4ed in his Sentaneh^e^ pha.se, Failure 4o iNivestigafe and Subpcena. eye. LUl'+Ki CSS.es ON the Qrfg/iaaJ fSoMe-e report. Failure 4o Subpoena 4Ae. arres4iVacj officer t Officer So+.la.ea.r- ba.se oai hit*. Not dainty DMA 4cs4irag cm 4K-c Sheetrock. Knife t and hecojuic of U>ha.f he Said in applicant &ond reduction heikcint^ I flUoU / Ae Sa\A he ha% had a Caic uuher e the defendant turned out to actually be the Victim, I*

foul are 4 a !wipea.eln the three m\ posters applicant pointed out durfnQ +rla,.\ thtA.t took the. Stun A .

CounSel Failure to S hauu pt>**f of a*iy /M- yes4/g~ 4Aa.*« uu het uuas done $u%t dons before a ppllcant's trio* I* 6Counsel Failure to Skouj ushad defense ho used*

Counsel Failure. to use the onh defense, «Jsri f 4h-c -evidences Stood Self- defense* IPw^H&ihJ *4"6 A Aya* ct 'for ^>r?v WoraftN p«e< 73 I-Kl- CONCLUSION

foe cause ®( Applicants Counsels erroneous Conduct a\pp\\c.an-rs uucuS foviM d qullty On the d in 4-Uis w\otion « its a fact Counsel did. not do any Inve^tla^aAina^ on appitccntr beA*{#v His /Wes-fi'gafar ms* Cy n-thio~ Torres ttSatd So AitrSe/f), in o-pplictLin +'s hecrina^ on Motion for neui The.!* Further i- Counsel Invoice IS proof of his pro crastinations i and It sAolus Counsel did Very little t& no invcstiat*AioN * Applicant alio w\aAe ck Note of each one of Counsel attorney Visit* "there Lucre. No* aftomey Clicnr Vtsit on 3-lir.t'S, ApplicaNt is ik» belief its a /arge Probability had Counsel follovu the herein le*-As the Out- Cov*\e u-»oold kave Ao&en different, £e.e. ^44a^ke.d affidavit, PflAYEfc UuH&fLeFotLB ¥, PREMISES Con SlO£ltE&,(A PPLICAnI i prays 4h«>J- the Courts qrants -this Motion ttt A:.b\j &i\i e €L unt\\ Complete records as hiereiM requested can k>e reviexued and /1/0*7 U.A W better prove U(s 'imno cen Se. *Further App licant request appOANi4-meN+ of Counsel to do So* _ **£tm

fft virion (Tor Ahs^K>c<. 4b^ .Aarr^ fnGfja* f^.«>e *H - VERIFICATION «-——»• - • '

I:, LARRY 3oe AlcR.GAWi-TbC3-.»-D# ISHIXAX be/Ng presently mcarcera^ed at "3 ft»we5 A/ i-ynayqh UMJ+ of TbCS declare, under penalty of periury +Smt the fbregotiMg tacts are. true. ai\id C&rreet,

bats &£ S2J3£a Oo\te i£. JJZ *oi£: 10*.* S^r^wY XflftT FT STOCKTON.TK*,

This fy 4o CerH-ff that ^a< fiecember /yt art/rffl4^ 0wd Corretet Cop\i of the above o/vd foregoirvQ l^tefiotf •4o fXhsianca. uug& mcsHe-d 4o 4Ae Clerk Abel A**>*ttL of 4hc £.our4 of Crim*No,i appeoJs of Tev^j af R_6, fto* JX^Of Capitol 5-fa+i'OiN-. AusfiAi Texa:5 7?7//;

QM*~„^„m**^„. „,• .Jio.,-—^, Came dw 4o b«. Consideredt Lar.^X "Hoe /morgan's Motion to Ah>y*.»e% Jits IL01 lurit of Wabea,s. Corpus* (^Cp ran ted ) \£> &M /ed J

gm^' Ji/&G£ PK&Smind :*$mv

JhOiioN 4o A*»V«:HC''«*: for ^rt^f jAft.ra^w p«9fc *s" D.£fcr. aj.ktr J~ am lurit-n^ v^u..^^. _ j:

.M.$.5>.tC "tot-. .CMrttStty i/vf&r.pio.-t.i'o*' l |.!:.".. . . . . I.kliS his... ht-tH MM oMV).os.M\ . ci yyiy

!.j..dau^.tAer. i| • , J [i-fcsf _£<-.{ 4a re :s oh the //yvd .X ca.lle.ci •-,„-,„ ycf-r /.....m-&-H eziMel JL. '••'&.. ...jM&±„. 4^£ OAi/y ci/e^t7,.jiiS't-.h:Kt u.OU 'Ao**t fcv-.m_e...:fr©7S3 B;dc*.m- |.|X doM't._isH6.iAj. iiou eMkt,.r-.,~Z....m.i4$t' 5f«.y..o,-v..4-p Q.f tk/s..!mv.iM ho Sia^t, uN-\:at-r^A ?_d. ...ii.C ca/.U'... 5iA.r-f^ ID H.p.m, o^.auo, H. Loll .^,4-y o4£ ? DAS the .three L&r.r.>j.'$ ceo^l. p.eje .ai& d.tfa-t,.&&&, £\uy. uji^k -fA< • j|./.£$4 ..^^*v>.e.^3^ft^j^v..^|.|:.ci.-f .4A*w s,v 4.fee dettct'y-c report .j.j.rteed..r:.£d .=fu^.*fqo .^e.JXf ...w.6U. coalA-nt SML.^rtJ.a, ' jjj-wy £MAt:.U^J'i.tr,. S'A-a^r... rp4 ...ev^iK^... -/uclued!*& pjci^ces / |. |.U.,. £•-iyi.di.leA. It: :/

J?/Mcier.es.ii/. srlGUMa folMO**. ! "J I.-A 1 - z_ o

.!..#!0.3:.1l ....<%.li J..M0.3:.' I L&.f>::?r4i ' . v-'i cDU ^tlfL-i {,;JUV>

\./Lnx:sL$ a.yi^

jHiik&j^../iy....>ijL^^ Q:.b.J..h*..£.Jj£.M£..]r^j£

...pjrL..h^4.^_.^fkS.._r..^^^Akt...p&rA .--iziy._4»r--cl£fB.r^ h.i-...cay^.(Uou'> ."t4cvl:

•-\JXLif. p.JlS:^-fi r_S_.ll..d:kM±^L^2Ci:d §„1Y£...ya«-AaS. ~^££ /i./<*/ I. ^ . . ', ' ,T . . . ]-rTorx....a^ikiA:.!±fcj'.i..<3l^£f *lJL(lf:5.3l:& nJ.M.^1. J,....a..cr.:£L.^tiLj^i.jJ....fe.c„. .4^i..Sxi.-f_/_^_x.^j.v_...(i&r_;*: uup. its Q^L.L.^:k$.M:^:^d.,zk ix.s. irj.

4-Ci^^J.AL.muj:A!jld^±^ ;—. ___

XM.y.^d&cZ. tAJ±£&..J.££jajb>d.&..id^ C-i:.."IiQ.(2, i • . ... - .- i~ ..j -—•) ~v-

jr>. n^.C.z£rid.L±3.....c.&*r.cLi_.^^^^^d^i£^i^^.im:C^.±^...JZ±a. Qn±...

^JALC-.^£j.lf^^ -j-o*\ - j EXHIBIT 1

DECLARATION OF INABILITY TO PAY rcv^j (The following Declaration ismade pursuant to the Texas Rules ofCivil Procedure andTitle 6, Chapter 132 ofthe Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code.) Now respectfully comes C/4/z./zY Ao£ MoiLfrfrM TDCJ * ('Kct7Z-£.'L- ,and declares that Iam unable to paythe courtcosts in this civil action and requests leave ofthe Court to proceed in forma pauperis in this accompanying civil action and would show theCourt the following:

(1) I am presently incarcerated in the /. Va/ t4 u G H Unit ofthe Texas Department ofCriminal Justice where Iam not permitted to earn or handle money. (2) I have no source of income orspousal income.

(3) Icurrently have $ - O — created to me in the Inmate Trust Fund. (4) During myincarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice I have received approximately $ —& - per month as gifts from relatives and friends. (5) I neither own nor have an interest in any realty, stocks, bonds, or bank accounts and I receive no interest or dividend income from any source. (6) I have .--.O - dependents.

(7) I have total debts' of approximately $ —

(9) My monthly expenses are approximately $ —O —

T» ' —CAe:*.Y rrot; /Mota*a/ , TDCJ /KQ7-L67 ,befog presentyrxarcerated in the S\k/s2(j0> N Unitof the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice in Ps,.^ County, Texas, verify and declare under penaltyofperjurythat the foregoing statements are true aridcorrect Exfxijrjxl onthis rhe —L day of he.ce.h^^e-.r- 20 / f . . (A) tdcOlaxl - PASSPORT Tuesday, December 01, 2015, 9:39:24 AM

CSINIB02/CINIB02 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 12/01/15 1AX1/SRA6141 IN-FORMA-PAUPERIS DATA 09:39:04 TDCJ#: 01847262 SID#: 02383400 LOCATION: JAMES LYNAUGH INDIGENT DTE: 06/15/15 NAME: MORGAN,LARRY JOE BEGINNING PERIOD: 06/01/15 PREVIOUS TDCJ NUMBERS: 00698539 CURRENT BAL: 0.00 TOT HOLD AMT 0.00 3MTH TOT DEP: 0 00 6MTH DEP: 20.00 6MTH AVG'BAL 0.00 6MTH AVG DEP: 3. 33 MONTH HIGHEST BALANCE TOTAL DEPOSITS MONTH HIGHEST BA TOTAL DEPOSITS 11/15 0,zoo 0.00 08/15 0.00 0.00 10/15 0,,00 0.00 07/15 0.00 0.00 09/15 0,,00 0.00 06/15 20.00 20.00 PROCESS DATE HOLD AMOUNT HOLD DESCRIPTION

STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF 'ptT&Ol ON THIS THE J_ DAY OF X>^PC^^A- Jyr I CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT IS A TRUE, COMPLETE,AND UNALTERED COPY MADE BY ME OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE COMPUTER DATABASE REGARDING THE OFFENDER'S ACCOUNT. NP SI£j PF1-HELP PF3-END ENTER NEXT TDCJ NUMBER: OR S>DNUMBER:

T7> 3* TD^t IW72&T-

J "-'-TV riN,.. »:,„;;_ bAtar/ttz ^^'C- Mvc0mn.T:..f"""'^T*„s • Zxfiirss 0:1 2'201 ' - ' Tr, c4. a/g. {L-S°tL -O lalZX-ixHmsr-A

LarrY 3ae WQkbfkN iki the Courj of Appeals "VS. ZECONto £>/S TlUcT STa~\e qFTex^, n n v-; of Tex,iks RECEIVED |^ dec 08 2015 (C^unT <3 F CRIMINAL DEC 0 3 2015 COURT OF APPEALS ^SS^S APPEALS 'ftfevlcfir*** SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 5 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS DEBRASPISAK, CLERK * DEC 14 2015

To THE Mas T. Hawaii ft LE TuoGE 4ci 4A-e_ Court iNVaki/^ q his ricjk+s. For ~rh-c f*rG>Auc-t\e>M a f his tirlnul records pursuant ta Cu(e l^.S-fa) (12.) a/^J 1H,S~(L), T^icas Hules af . Appellate rra^.d-Aure., HIS To 1LY f Applicant J lucls Convicted of Aqyrai/a+eA assault uJ'itk a Ae-aAi\j uuea.p&iK, t -to- Witt a Kn'i fe'~ oiv DOarch XlLt 2.611* cam A SdLnte,M£.ot'ic>hjs /a/ciAjQ lu ffU: /its. /V)a>ii6Ki fSr- N£.LU TrlaJ KeauCS,t -for- Prep ara.t\c±K o-f iZcpo-rtcr's K-CCorA and be.£l#iAj£Lti&i^ of /Matters. to he. \NC-luAe.A vJr IttcN bcS>iQ}hjatioM £ p ccffytAjq Mo Hon for ProdocHo* o-f £.ccorTor9^v f>«.Q& I iTl after ^ for In Cl us'iqn in Clerk's Record* nouj&vcr, 4he. rECarcl SA/erc Never fully (developed , a^d Wiy Appe_\loLM4 Counsel LaJ 11 It'ccKvi 5. Harris Subselaucntfy LfUttkAroLvu as CoumSC^I therefore-f KJot uultusfa/^dt/^ci Hi's duties 4$, Coun£cIc

R£^owa>vl£a/^ aT/On s F/Lq^ THE £TATB Am b •e Latb/l QftbtiL &Y THE Couic-TJ

•Necessity For. AN EvitsenTiAfiY H£A/i/n£ Anu £x- PAMSiON of TtiE ilECOftb] (^applicant's Response'J In orAer t& Support the //,0 V. J-taL*.e^s Carpus appiic-a.^t N-c-e^A 4& revieuj akiJ ci~fc h\t -the. CccorA Errors of TrltK.1 CqumSC I , oii\id App>L./l&/\jt jLoumScI* Otk-Cr-uSiSc- GJcpaNS>ic>KJ a4 tk-t- rt-C-OrA iS, W\e^K.sitiMql£,<,S for [_AP^LIcAnT J, therefore, Nat //v -fke liKtit.re.st of 3 u <.tice,

T"k-t— StcuteS. Latu Library Slnaula have oav Ft'l-c / 4A<_ Carvxpl^fc reearA tkoL.t^Ah^LldMsTTjSe.ets. nppticaiut re.au-est fke. Court -ro C^ar^pn/ ~fAc Iria^l Courts -fcccsductldN of reporter's records a/vd Ex.- nih\ts sTurtkcr i uurttt-Cx/ IScsIqm Oi.tl&*j Spcc-ify'tj\iQ Wv otters far u\j £.(us't s/\i iaj Klerk's record as tk-e, ChppeAlc^Kdt CouAjSe.1 rnciut^t /7s» ^/'S Qri-CkIhclI /Vla4fois/ CjM April SrA, 2.0/2 4 CoNsfftutia^ ,

Tkt. ''dfcAj'i'cu'l of fc&,uj jYta.f erwa^/ Wflfcei: for"' tf me.a*NiNaleSs reWeuJ of 4^-£- errors a4 CauNSe^l . "Hi uS 4A £, /5ip'jp Ifa. a/v 4 a^6i^7 \ta o4 fact a^id CostClosibM of

PLAYER. LuHfift.ftFoK.fc/ PRE.lT)IsB-S CgnSI£ ££.£fty (/I p&h'ca*jfj pra_y£ 4Ia^_4 4kC Court Q-rexNts tb'is. matf&N o m 4ktL ^^-€.r-/4s , ai^A i i\i the. tstfex-eit of J usfrcc* R.e^sp£c*ffull\f Sukmlfte, A IMoiiou 'for P>01 duciiOM 0' f £&Cor(i~$ -for Lavr-v /Yl6r§c»» PAk/

VEKIFICATldM

l LAkifOr 3"o& /Hor.gaa// TDC3 -/ b# i$LilLQi- A>e/A/g pre$CN-riy i'Mcarccratcd at "la-mes /L LyNn\.udk unit ofTbCl cHe-Cleitc uhja£,r pe,M rx\f\i at perSur^i tkc^f tk^ fhre.- txc>\t^c± facts. • Arc true. «aj d £.'orrcc4/

D Oli &J£ 11 J1£P {Safe „Q= jQ± T.O J^C JO IK S,//wY A01>*1 F T' S -foe ktdiM T * <•

TkIS Is to CCrtifi fUcct okj fieeenhze.r •/st o n /s^ /> 4r tke. Clerk. AbeJ A COS 4cl of +he. (Court est Cr/flnl/si&l at fiO,&av IliOir £api4oL Sfx+foNj Austin Te*as 1^/1. and court of rXp^ccul s Sec on A &/strict of T&*Cls Tim Curr^ ~5ust'icc Center ^o/ uj, !Se.\KhJCA.p Su/4e_ ^ooo(FT, U-Jortl^i / ex&s °~7(olclL r~\ & pro 5&- £>RftFfc-

^M XO £A»vn-e_ oj\t 4o Le Cosj siAcr^A. LAfcfcY TgG: /V)a£S/:}Kj'.S , motion -he Coynpe.1 -tine. Pro ductIon of hk rcpor4cr5 records raN+cA) (beN'eA) Idcs&e: Pil£ S i IS i n &

mofioa* fbr ^rodvcito*>/ o-f /leoo/^ds fb

AmkAVIT For. AAKKyDBrAAaH^^y i am jLaPjhy "See* IT)orgo n onA I am the applicant in «.! i •«-•'••• . n. This LaSe- / arm aver /£ year* Of«->Abelaje, Acosta, Clerk #av^ £0/>i- peie*-f 4o jv»afC«. 4Ms aff iAavit. I have, persoma i Knowledge. «f 4K*. 4oc4$ in tk\s affidavit/' Ffowx 4Att riwte. I UJas -Ffrsf represented, by my tr-ial «l46rMev/ S^o44 uJaftCer I ?n farmed fiiVi +Ha+ 1 ha J acfed in Self de.fe.Nse /n tbh cas os.fi. the defease #f Self defense. I ujoula have. 4o testify at tke QuWt p Wa i «. of vv\v tria. I*M\# a4+ or ki ev Afeve r rAa«A&. m*. flujfisre of 4f*U £r*vc(oU iVfirnwHoKu

I ta fd wry Coun4cl, / /Tlr, W aIk'«.r fh&.4 j u>aAjfed to -testify? After all of 4/it~ S&ifVs uiftnesses haA testified and th*. State, had rested/ / Deleave t tUais UuheN /Dm Walker and A/s /N WcSf/ga+or-; Ms., CyAithicL Terrvz. &*we> to me.

APFt&AviT F©fcL Mfffc'Y Moftftf/j fftft I AFFIDAVIT

^SSured me. tUat tUe. trial uJeNT UJell 3 OS 1 KMetu it did becauj£- of- ail tke. C0N~ -flicliNa TesrimoNfes b\j t k e. Stales u^il^es-aes* couwse.1 nisft 4olA m-a. wot 4a fasti fy awd if I AtA I ujOuIA be. fuuwa gy/llv* I Could <3^ up "*"* ^ ^ea^s, bu+ if I did Not testify / u/fll be foui^d Not guilty. /fth< UJtHlkec (W&ver)-fold me- /ie Luas fafc/Ng Self clefemSe^ f because, he. Kweiu I ujould Kc\v-t^ (N&v&r) agreed KNou/iNg 4k«c+, /Hr LJ*IK< OJoAke,r took, advantage, o-f iv\\j litcroLCSff Upon kiV assurai^ee* qmA only i/jitk his Cxss t;rawci?. / &.r of £/gwa.4uy*e-S • ^/c«c/ Ae tjftvC nr,C the Necessary lNforn>ux,fior,i i ujouU) AAve. testified tc> the CveNts of tkout a-Pte.r-NQOM ini the %.£aw\& iviaNMt^ thoA I A\A clur//\i^ >v?\f ~^DKy|||p n4v^eju4 pko^s^- of 4im*u! *tS f*ec.orAcL.d in th-cV'^fl *"'i»Cs.f

AmWit -"::gg triai ..record--. There- uuere. 3 11 Ck l\evs of +ke events Of fke after.N.GfcN* I k ujc^r/ivig Jiust as' ujeli as ajkk«,iM iv\^ CouAiSel tunaed tt off* t Need t* Yv\d. be tkvs £at~;4 ver>j eie~R6.m Ujas "ike. last CaAl2.r> &jas fiVst gnA S>e qni 'Uje.iiL.-tke- ias-t Co.\\cr\ an tk-e ££-/S.Qm uuas fke. uo$Sft(Uwfi dfri*/ frie/sid / Luki'ck. mates k«.r a lyev~ bec.au.se- Ske. S^id S/i-e, uuas Jt>s4 ge+t- lK»ij tkertt fraw Luoric^but J Ske. testified in TitiOl[ 4k«c4 5ke. Uia»s Sa44/'v£ NC¥.t 4~ .. aLle, 4c> ^*^ * Wad Counts. I IJe-^tif/eA her

•Aff t'd*vit for •Lf; /vi©r^{K/./ ''PeL*,€i'$ •VV--;1Y ;*.•-.'?*•*... ,/-.

AFFIDAVIT Fr6m h-er phoNt* Number , cinJ /Nferwewel 'her ONid S ubpo&Maed I her i s/ie Luould have amplified her Statements on the Call* Her Aes cr'ijbtioNS lugs 4l*.e JeveNts as tkev uuert, t^fciNCj jslace/ ^nJ ujosji also Contrary -to the State's... ujItAiesses * _ li Couwitl had four I tfddf f fowa I CCS~ROM£ at kts desrsosr/./^/ 5auj Wtwj uuhe* Ae Sat 4hem on -the, fabki. before we. / beh'eve he had every /NteKifiON to pia\/ them (.t>u4.)ffor Same, csdd reason Ae did no t* I k&licvc Not p Iavi /im g 4Ae. add /4/o ^ ol/ C&*- /? arn s was &N&t - her crro/vcous declstoN* &pp\ic&Nt tolA c^oOsiSe I OjheN he Laos attacked b^j tke. assAUam-ts fl uuas between 3?f$T pm oa/^/ 'H'ji $r pw\ \ thereofore. i if Lu&re, 5traMg«. lu/i^n/ / luclS\ reviveA L\i lMcAst*r at tke Criv^e. S^«uvl it lugs dust dckxtk.^ )/yi ccln In a // uu04 aba|u t ?>/ S~* p^\ • /N AuQUS*r it gets dark a boot-! ^JJOG pnA. £<=> if I ujols K^ackcd Un£U5aj5c/ous at as* late a% ST/OO t>h* 3 liouri /A/v/i w $*• ivif#Aiutes 7s un accouNfaLI-e. for, 1 tolil fkts TO CoyNScl /n per son 6/psN Ofr first mee-r/Wcj a/ud as you lu/M See. / meAit-foN/s rt /V/ rA-e attacked 'letters,^ -v.. *.~.'i-M T,';!i -n

r\Ff IbAvfT lit® Further, Hs a PrabaL/lfty - "the five Cb~ ROm S tjuTII Solve fAe loss of 3-Aoi/rs aW ^S" Wnsitues for the applicant) and the Court, /ts a -Tact the SdcOwd .VvVne / uj^s 5fw- bbv»|be^[ heavily after he Knock ed me. to the ground* AgafNj rAese- CO ~y<6^ discs. houses Some, tram/abt«- lisjfhrmatie*iv , 4a Keep tl\em lu // / £>e gre:a-f In-A us 4/4, le /f -rAey ore. no) CoNCe.<^l&d* my CouNSel mr. £, uua.lKer {Never) de+livtr&A Wly Client -p/les ro me. , tker^fore , //7r, CUalkcr is CONtlhJuiNq -to 'iwxped w\ y case f accord - //Nig -4e> fAe. Texas Boar-A of &isclp liNarsf rule l,H .Safe. 6Ce.ep/N* Property (h>)^/tfr.uJalker Should have. delivered /v?e iv\y ClieN^f Piles UpoM request-. Further* more. t I have d&cutweNt- aticKi that Said he has /XLI iter^iS * / have. W\a\lv-A W\r, Lual leer A/umtrous of reaues.t 'for fY\y client file , at\ d 7" have aot-heM (hio> reply)' /IgAiW tills 9/1 Caller- I Speak of UJQS epre££/vf !i\*q -that l\ Luas be//vg attacked* CouNSel -failed To /dentify } at^td iNvestlgate^ Affidavit for C**

frcr - thi$- CaN Nat be ;considered S6unA trial 5 4ra4e9y« 5 Ae. held faeutal iiMformatfoiM d/scfos~ Im£ / a/as /n fact hziNCj af4acfced by the. State's chief Compiaiuort u>ko djqs fAe assa- .1 la-NT In fkh matter* I #m UMabi^. 4© obfaiK* iistcN ,,.,f.o. 0C Create, o tr*N Script of this Caller L/j/tkouf the. di&- ^lo5 0»*e &f the -friVi reperkr records, There fore, f aw\ beiivita i^mpcAed to Ac a mcaniNcifol IhOli .UJrit of Afabeas Corpus/' I have prese^fed ma.4eria,i 4«c43 4ka.4 is Stlk\ UNtesoive.A t a»\iA is m/s reprc, se^teA &y Triou\ Coum Sets as the. issues Camp laired ot> Tr i•<*, I fcouw Se / 5 ta ?7c d 4e /n vt s tiaate a 1/ 4^e $*'•'

AFFtrlavi't- for • L.*.rr\t l*iorot./u •?&£•* 4: "•*£..

1 5J Further, I F. The . crs&aiiaiuf - fold 4h s~ police I lA/O^ CkaSlNO 'h/to -ft-S ^1t d/d/ / LUOU-I d had 4-o be a reallv/ fast tUNNer fo Cut Ow tke. iNSide of h*s /e3 , as he told the. police. Further i I t&ld i'vwj Counsel I have fuuc. plevtes. i awa IS? Screws iJN mv Ti'cj^if /e^ *tS Jmposs/bie- for me 4o ruw fastj /VKj /X yeari olj daug-rker* Ccn.^i ftpf ruw mi2.« A-aai iu i ts har <£' 4b dC C/i* UN SC I r<& SOi\l for- -failure ofi, SukpceAiflcfiM a 4£»e a'rrest/ncj officer* CocNtSei faffed to giVc kts Client aw Opportun ity to Show pkysfca.1 evlAe.Ne-fe bv NOT doi^a D to & 4es4 /n a • fur 4u.e r- f Mr, So. iA-T-av* 5 rkfe mcn t ir>4 • iw* . bo*\ d reaucttow. thearuMO^ 'i*JaS Cruet*-} to W\m defense of Self ^ de-fensc* tNCictSihtQ all 4ke toc4s herein ana in ton\i mo4k>M 4o ak^iOLMce mw ll«0i S/ia«4-»s cleaurly CcuMSe/ir v^rroivj e ouS p er f&r K*« nu! $ &n d C l-early SAcCjS IN - effective «assls4aKice of CouNSel v a^d to add to 14 (Col/mScIs impedi'kic$ ^hvxw .appeals bv ajo4 del--- ?\'Cr >'im a rvt«- m.y

/Qiq S>cglL,J. NOki I kavc Skort tcr wa. me>vxorvj /osf Ar4kri'4is ./n 4fo-c kaK»ds / A-eJd up tr^iii^ci to defend my 5e/f • A^d tke. perpetrators /s loose. frtic t& attack Sov^eo/*e. else,, I • mst r£.aues4i'iNj q appaihj fv*\CH 4 of Counsel i'm tU*. Interest of ^us ti'c-c*'/) aaiivi mM actua.1 ^relief i's qraM-fi'^A i^y */''^7 So that Austlce .:•.¥'• Uu!l\ be Served* /Hy Second -forh<\ of relief IS 4o graKif mv* AbyaNcc , ai\>d atlouj rn-e. tkre. loo,Is Lukick i's Y^\ii TnVl records a% reCLuesteA So I Caw do o wie.c*>NiMOtfl>l l)>07 In f Ac u\i tcr* c-s 4 o f J cj| £. 4 ic e.« TA.'s Conclude, hAy a-f-fiAavlt. VEktfl -CATiOki I ; k^RkV 3ofc mo^G.^^ , TOC5-/b# J?H7Z.6>Z. beiN$ presently lNCarcera.ftA o+ 3"a>nes A. ZyXaugAT'"'^#7r''TVf'"'T&'eJ''dse/ore--'-' UNde.r pe.NiAlry of perSury i4Aaf 4Ae faregofwq facts arc 4rue <3i\/d Correct/ ^> A ^, /UAH* J& OA. XO JLST /O^S S, #h/Y 2037 FT SToc/CTo** Tx, 7

AfF/OAviT Fok thiikY tifokQ,an Pq3£ * ....;'v; i "smfl if <&avert at ^nnetxls ^e&cntl} ^tatrtct of ©exas p. (§. ^ox 9540 J^martllo, Plexus 79105-9540 - •m

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS LOISE PEARSON 201 WEST 14TH STREET, RM. 106 AUSTIN, TX 78701