Morfaw v. Holder
This text of Morfaw v. Holder (Morfaw v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1249
MARTIN AGENDA MORFAW,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 9, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danielle Beach-Oswald, Amy M. Grunder, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Patrick J. Bumatay, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Martin Agenda Morfaw, a native and citizen of
Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to
reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re: Morfaw (B.I.A. Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morfaw v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morfaw-v-holder-ca4-2009.