Morfaw v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Morfaw v. Holder

312 F. App'x 535

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2009·No. No. 08-1249·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin Agenda Morfaw, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Morfaw (B.I.A. Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin Agenda Morfaw, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Morfaw (B.I.A. Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Morfaw v. Holder, 312 F. App'x 535 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

312 F. App'x 535 (Morfaw v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related