Moretz v. . Ray

75 N.C. 170
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1876·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bynum, J.

This case comes up to this Court upon a demurrer to the complaint. Neither the bond of the Register of Deeds is set out in the complaint or the conditions thereof, so that the Court can see that any breach has been committed or even that the bond required by law has been executed by the defendants.

Waiving all this, however, and assuming that the usual Register’s bond has been filed by the defendants, we have decided at this term of the Court, in the case of Holt v. McLean, et al., the facts of which are almost identical with this, that an action on the bond cannot be maintained. The remedy of the plaintiff is either by indictment or an action for damages against the Register of Deeds individually.

There is no error.

Per CrTHiAM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moretz v. . Ray, 75 N.C. 170 (N.C. 1876).

75 N.C. 170 (Moretz v. . Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson v. McArthur
67 S.E. 995 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
State Bank v. Brennan
7 Colo. App. 427 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1896)
State ex rel. Daniel v. Grizzard
117 N.C. 105 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Daniel v. . Grizzard
23 S.E. 93 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
State Ex Rel. Kivett v. Young
10 S.E. 1019 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)