Moretti v. Coughlin

232 A.D.2d 685, 647 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10063
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 685 (Moretti v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moretti v. Coughlin, 232 A.D.2d 685, 647 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lewis, J.), entered March 2, 1995 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner is an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County. As the result of an investigation in which petitioner was recorded during a telephone conversation soliciting an unidentified individual to purchase heroin from his cousin, petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from possessing, selling or exchanging controlled substances and from smuggling. Petitioner raises a number of procedural challenges to this determination arguing, inter alia, that the hearing was hot timely commenced and that he was denied effective employee assistance.

Inasmuch as the hearing started on the sixth day after petitioner was served with the misbehavior report, we reject his claim that the hearing was not timely commenced (see, 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a]). Further, because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that his assistant’s omissions prejudiced his defense, he cannot prevail on his claim of ineffective employee assistance (see, Matter of Bryant v Mann, 199 AD2d 676; Matter of Serrano v Coughlin, 152 AD2d 790). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be unavailing.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greene v. Coombe
242 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Barnhill v. Coombe
239 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Brooks v. State
238 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D.2d 685, 647 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moretti-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1996.