Morette v. Rosa

190 A.D.2d 1071, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1315
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed with costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reject petitioner’s contention that protracted administrative delay ousted the State Division of Human Rights of jurisdiction (see, Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816). Because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that she suffered substantial prejudice by reason of the delay, we confirm the determination (see, Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Howard Johnson Co., 122 AD2d 949, 950; Matter of Rores v Passidomo, 104 AD2d 727). (Executive Law § 298 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wolfgang, [1072]*1072J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morette v. Rosa, 190 A.D.2d 1071, 594 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 1071 (Morette v. Rosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corning Glass Works v. Ovsanik
199 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)